The People’s Electoral Movement (MEP) – the largely empty carcass of AD’s left-wing faction that broke away from the party in the 60s – recently held its internal national assembly to elect its main authorities.

In that context, Chairman Andrés Lusiano Lara and Secretary-General Wilmer Nolasco were ratified, along with the rest of its main board and other party internal bodies. The process took three months and was carried out with what is described as “total normalcy” – normalcy, that is, for a party that has long ago ceased to be relevant, but which holds non-negligible real estate on Venezuelan elections ballots, given its age.

The TSJ’s (Supreme Tribunal) Electoral Hall had other ideas, and they decided that “normalcy” wasn’t good enough.

It decided to throw the whole process out, and named a new national board for the MEP, headed by Gilberto Jiménez, National Coordinator of the “Mi Casa Bien Equipada” government program. Remarkably, the TSJ received the case, admitted it and made its decision in a single day. Los tiempos de Diosdado son… sorprendentes a veces.

So, the TSJ basically hijacked a political party.

Nolasco puts the blame on the governing party, the PSUV, and hints that the ruling came after a meeting with the government’s Elías Jaua, in which MEP leaders demanded a quota of three main deputies and ten substitutes, threatening to run a separate list of candidates if they were not satisfied.

I’m guessing the PSUV didn’t like the offer and made its move: the TSJ-appointed board will be now in charge of naming the MEP’s candidates for the 6-D election.

“This decision is an outlandish ruling and was taken by instructions of PSUV high-profile members, including (Anzoategui State) governor Aristóbulo Istúriz… This is a threat from the PSUV to all allied parties so they accept the candidacies they’re given…”

Earlier this year, Nolasco considered dropping out of the GPP (the chavista alliance) altogether, due to serious differences with Barinas State Governor and brother of the late comandante presidente, Adán Chávez.

This is a low point for the MEP, a small party born of AD’s internal divisions.

Founded by 1967 by the late, great Luis Beltrán Prieto Figueroa (who got almost 20% of the vote in the 1968 presidential election), it never repeated that kind of support. In the eighties, they supported the presidential tickets of José Vicente Rangel (1983) and infamous psychiatrist Edmundo Chrinos (1988), candidates that did not bring any improvements in its vote tally.

Finally, the MEP came into power in the nineties by joining two coalitions: Rafael Caldera’s “chiripero” in 1993, and Hugo Chavez’s Polo Patriotico in 1998. In 2008, the party kicked out its then-leader Eustoquio Contreras, who two years earlier wanted to merge the MEP with the PSUV (and later changed his mind). He personally blamed Nolasco.

Today, Contreras leads the Vanguardia Bolivariana Republicana (a position he achieved with a little help from the CNE as part of another dissident chavista party knee-capping).

The PSUV’s leadership is sending a warning to its allies: bájale dos a las expectativas, or face the consequences.

16 thoughts on “MEPjacking

    • Aristo, menos mal no te descubrieron tu mansion/yate en Aruba, tus caballos en el Hipodromo, tus…(true story)


      • Realmente de lo que tiene que estar agradecido aristofraude, es de que no le cojan sus declaraciones ridículas burlándose por el control de cambio y se las pongan a la gente chavista a todo volumen junto con algo que diga “el control de cambio tiene la culpa de que tú hagas cola y no consigas una mierda ningún día, y de que todo cueste un riñón y un ojo de la cara”


  1. ¿No era esto lo mismo que le hicieron al Patada Por el Trasero y a Pornoemos y que creo que hasta a Copei se la hicieron hace unos años?


  2. Why do all these random minor fringe parties persist?

    Who supports them? I.e. who pays the bills for the party’s operations?

    In the U.S., a party which has no chance of electing anybody gets no support and dissolves. (Or collapses to complete insignificance – 0.01% vote share.) Canada, pretty much the same, despite the fairly significant niches open to additional parties and the major realignments of the last several elections.


Comments are closed.